top of page

Author

Arnold Beisser

Author of "Paradoxical Theory of Change"

Although brief, the "Paradoxical Theory of Change" is, outside of the works of Frederick Perls, the most frequently referenced article in the body of Gestalt therapy literature.  Written in 1970, it originally appeared in Fagan and Shepherd's Gestalt Therapy Now, a publication of The Gestalt Journal Press.





Arnold Beisser - His Place Within Gestalt Therapy

Arnold Beisser is remembered within Gestalt therapy primarily for one extraordinarily influential paper:

“The Paradoxical Theory of Change” (1970).

Although Beisser did not produce the same volume of publications as figures such as Fritz Perls, Joseph Zinker, or Erving Polster, his contribution became foundational because it articulated something central to Gestalt philosophy in remarkably concise and clinically powerful language.

Within Gestalt circles, Beisser is often spoken about with a certain reverence because his theory captured the essence of Gestalt psychotherapy’s attitude toward change, selfhood, and human development.


1. The Paradoxical Theory of Change

Beisser’s most famous statement is:

“Change occurs when one becomes what he is, not when he tries to become what he is not.”

This sentence became one of the defining formulations within Gestalt therapy.

The core argument of the paper is that genuine change does not happen through force, self-improvement pressure, role performance, or attempts to imitate an idealised self. Instead, change emerges through fuller awareness and acceptance of present experience.

In Gestalt terms:

  • awareness precedes change

  • contact precedes integration

  • becoming oneself is transformative

  • forced self-manipulation often produces further fragmentation

The paper was published in:Beisser, A. (1970) ‘The paradoxical theory of change’, in Fagan, J. and Shepherd, I. (eds.) Gestalt Therapy Now. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.


2. Why the Theory Became So Influential

The theory resonated because it challenged dominant assumptions about psychotherapy and self-development.

Many therapeutic and cultural systems operate on the assumption:

  • identify deficits

  • correct deficits

  • construct a better self

Beisser argued something much subtler:that trying to become an imagined version of oneself can actually increase alienation from lived experience.

The Gestalt position he articulated suggests:

  • change is emergent rather than imposed

  • authenticity matters more than performance

  • integration occurs through awareness

  • disowned aspects of self require contact rather than suppression

This became deeply influential not only in Gestalt therapy but across:

  • humanistic psychotherapy

  • encounter group culture

  • existential therapy

  • later relational approaches

3. His Personal History Deeply Shaped His Thinking

Biographical reflections on Beisser often refer to the profound impact of his experience with polio.

Arnold Beisser had been an athlete and medical doctor before contracting polio as a young adult, leaving him significantly physically disabled and dependent on an iron lung for periods of his life. (Wikipedia)

Many commentators believe this experience fundamentally shaped his understanding of acceptance, identity, limitation, adaptation, and authenticity.

His writing carries a quality that many readers experience as existentially grounded rather than merely theoretical.

There is often a sense that his understanding of “becoming what one is” emerged not as abstract philosophy, but from lived confrontation with loss, bodily limitation, and altered identity.


4. How He Is Spoken About Within Gestalt Therapy

Within Gestalt literature and training, Beisser is commonly described as:

  • thoughtful

  • deeply humane

  • philosophically elegant

  • existentially grounded

  • clinically wise

Unlike some early Gestalt figures who became associated with confrontation or dramatic interventions, Beisser’s work is usually experienced as quieter and more contemplative.

His theory is often used to counter:

  • self-improvement culture

  • performative therapy

  • therapist-driven agendas

  • idealised notions of mental health

Many contemporary relational practitioners still use Beisser’s paradoxical theory implicitly, even when working in trauma-informed or attachment-oriented frameworks.


5. Contemporary Interpretations

Modern therapists frequently reinterpret Beisser relationally.

A contemporary relational reading might suggest:

People often attempt to become what was required for attachment, safety, or survival.

Therapy therefore becomes less about constructing a new self and more about:

  • recovering disowned experience

  • relinquishing imposed identities

  • tolerating contact with vulnerability

  • allowing organismic self-regulation to re-emerge

This is one reason Beisser’s paper continues to feel contemporary despite its age.


6. Critiques and Limitations

Some contemporary critiques suggest that the paradoxical theory can be oversimplified or romanticised.

Potential critiques include:

  • underestimating structural oppression and social conditions

  • insufficient attention to trauma physiology

  • risk of passivity if misunderstood

  • possibility of minimising deliberate behavioural change

However, most critiques are directed less at Beisser himself and more at simplistic uses of the theory.

In practice, most contemporary Gestalt therapists understand the paradoxical theory as:not passive resignation,but deepening awareness and contact as the condition for meaningful transformation.


7. His Continuing Legacy

Arnold Beisser’s influence far exceeds the size of his published output.

His paradoxical theory remains:

  • one of the most quoted ideas in Gestalt therapy

  • central to Gestalt teaching worldwide

  • influential in relational psychotherapy

  • philosophically aligned with phenomenology and existentialism

Many therapists continue to find the theory clinically stabilising because it offers an alternative to:

  • coercive change

  • performative wellness

  • therapeutic perfectionism

  • ideal-self psychology


Overall Impression

Area

Common View

Major contribution

The Paradoxical Theory of Change

Clinical emphasis

Awareness before imposed change

Tone

Humane, existential, thoughtful

Historical importance

Foundational Gestalt thinker

Personal influence

Polio experience shaped his philosophy

Contemporary relevance

Still highly influential relationally

Limitation

Sometimes oversimplified in modern use

Arnold Beisser is often remembered less as a prolific theorist and more as someone who articulated one of the deepest philosophical truths within Gestalt psychotherapy:

that genuine transformation often emerges not through striving to become someone else, but through fuller contact with who and how one already is.


Useful Links

Arnold Beisser biography:Wikipedia biography of Arnold Beisser

Overview of the paradoxical theory of change:Gestalt Therapy Networker article on the paradoxical theory of change

Discussion of Beisser’s theory in Gestalt practice:British Gestalt Journal related resources


References (Harvard Style)

Beisser, A. (1970) ‘The paradoxical theory of change’, in Fagan, J. and Shepherd, I. (eds.) Gestalt Therapy Now. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.

Clarkson, P. and Mackewn, J. (1993) Fritz Perls. London: Sage.

Mackewn, J. (1997) Developing Gestalt Counselling. London: Sage.

‘Arnold Beisser’ (2026) Wikipedia. Available at:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_Beisser

Yontef, G. and Jacobs, L. (2014) Gestalt Therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Publications

Book

Title:

Gestalt Therapy Now

Publication Reference:

Fagan, J., Shepherd, I. L.,  2003 Gestalt Therapy Now. The Gestalt Journal Press

bottom of page